Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 04:27:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61584459784E56FFE25104DF560DD6C881881FE0C28C93D178D8EF7F163F7C4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note does not address the claims made in the original tweet, nor does it contextualise them. Questions have been raised on the reporting of the NYT on the story it ran on sexual assaults on October 7th, around evidence and journalistic integrity https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763122569949913286
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61584459784E56FFE25104DF560DD6C881881FE0C28C93D178D8EF7F163F7C4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1709267237397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176312256994991328661584459784E56FFE25104DF560DD6C881881FE0C28C93D178D8EF7F163F7C4C