Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 13:39:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B187EF277D235C89480712C9354712007B7F656E22C4A5B99F05B17781BD723
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note does not address the claims made in the original tweet, nor does it contextualise them. Questions have been raised on the reporting of the NYT on the story it ran on sexual assaults on October 7th, around evidence and journalistic integrity https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763122569949913286
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B187EF277D235C89480712C9354712007B7F656E22C4A5B99F05B17781BD723
  • createdAtMillis - 1709213951604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17631225699499132865B187EF277D235C89480712C9354712007B7F656E22C4A5B99F05B17781BD723