Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 19:49:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 02D55528218D72D644DF791FCE76D39B2A2CDEEE49A1EE97714BBE7C557102C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note does not address the claims made in the original tweet, nor does it contextualise them. Questions have been raised on the reporting of the NYT on the story it ran on sexual assaults on October 7th, around evidence and journalistic integrity https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763122569949913286
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 02D55528218D72D644DF791FCE76D39B2A2CDEEE49A1EE97714BBE7C557102C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1709236143712
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176312256994991328602D55528218D72D644DF791FCE76D39B2A2CDEEE49A1EE97714BBE7C557102C0