Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 01:29:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 796F42626DAD8B7FFE69F7B3A06AA2D393092B555ABB6EF81A8C99392874833E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim made by this account isn’t accurate anymore. Kiribati’s population had decent sanitisation levels of around 35% in 2005. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/ISF_KiribatiWASH.pdf Compare this to today, with the main island South Tarawa now having 80%. https://www.sprep.org/att/IRC/eCOPIES/Countries/Kiribati/16.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762990132326437298
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 796F42626DAD8B7FFE69F7B3A06AA2D393092B555ABB6EF81A8C99392874833E
  • createdAtMillis - 1709170199376
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762990132326437298796F42626DAD8B7FFE69F7B3A06AA2D393092B555ABB6EF81A8C99392874833E