Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 03:23:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 750D7260795C7B9D8A569ECAFF91F1A7684E1D9A4D4F4FD6D3E2E96163452813
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim made by this account isn’t accurate anymore. Kiribati’s population had decent sanitisation levels of around 35% in 2005. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/ISF_KiribatiWASH.pdf Compare this to today, with the main island South Tarawa now having 80%. https://www.sprep.org/att/IRC/eCOPIES/Countries/Kiribati/16.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762990132326437298
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 750D7260795C7B9D8A569ECAFF91F1A7684E1D9A4D4F4FD6D3E2E96163452813
  • createdAtMillis - 1709176990318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762990132326437298750D7260795C7B9D8A569ECAFF91F1A7684E1D9A4D4F4FD6D3E2E96163452813