Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 16:33:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C186AAEDC62D98A1284D74B5202271C2586035886D039FB082D2F75D5CB8942
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim made by this account isn’t accurate anymore. Kiribati’s population had decent sanitisation levels of around 35% in 2005. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/ISF_KiribatiWASH.pdf Compare this to today, with the main island South Tarawa now having 80%. https://www.sprep.org/att/IRC/eCOPIES/Countries/Kiribati/16.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762990132326437298
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C186AAEDC62D98A1284D74B5202271C2586035886D039FB082D2F75D5CB8942
  • createdAtMillis - 1709224409690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17629901323264372983C186AAEDC62D98A1284D74B5202271C2586035886D039FB082D2F75D5CB8942