Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 07:31:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F703681D974B4324D019B51F5B831EC4D113295DA73F6F29E865B608CE62F29
Participant Details

Original Note:

「など」として意図的に省略されていますが、大麻取締法違反と合わせた判決です。 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUF152LG0V10C24A2000000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762988648067383361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F703681D974B4324D019B51F5B831EC4D113295DA73F6F29E865B608CE62F29
  • createdAtMillis - 1709191906870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17629886480673833610F703681D974B4324D019B51F5B831EC4D113295DA73F6F29E865B608CE62F29