Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 00:42:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90F251257553FDBDD2C0921705CB2D611E550647E255C2CDEA3119392381A573
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mullis never said what the post claims. In fact, he specifically patented the technology for infectious disease diagnostics Also Mullis's technology is not the embodiment used today. In fact he never used qPCR. The post is entirely false https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.2448875 https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/jvi.61.5.1690-1694.1987

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762978440184037793
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90F251257553FDBDD2C0921705CB2D611E550647E255C2CDEA3119392381A573
  • createdAtMillis - 1709167347256
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176297844018403779390F251257553FDBDD2C0921705CB2D611E550647E255C2CDEA3119392381A573