Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 05:17:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B23492FD0A8314501F50F5820E584E67561C8E017F56F15259954601635579BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Correctiv hat vor Gericht in 2 von 3 Punkten Recht bekommen. Die Aussagen der Recherche wurde vom Gericht nicht in Zweifel gezogen. Eine Gegendarstellung seitens Correctiv zur Hauptaussage der Recherche gab es nie. https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/2024/01/12/news-geheimplan-afd-correctiv-live/ https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762970729274872300
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B23492FD0A8314501F50F5820E584E67561C8E017F56F15259954601635579BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1709183838255
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762970729274872300B23492FD0A8314501F50F5820E584E67561C8E017F56F15259954601635579BE