Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 18:15:09 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2AEA04374604D59F5AC11E95308D5F9817470BF3D23300D7AF8A651C7F61C06F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Correctiv hat vor Gericht in 2 von 3 Punkten Recht bekommen. Die Aussagen der Recherche wurde vom Gericht nicht in Zweifel gezogen. Eine Gegendarstellung seitens Correctiv zur Hauptaussage der Recherche gab es nie. https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/2024/01/12/news-geheimplan-afd-correctiv-live/ https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762970729274872300
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2AEA04374604D59F5AC11E95308D5F9817470BF3D23300D7AF8A651C7F61C06F
createdAtMillis - 1709230509800
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17629707292748723002AEA04374604D59F5AC11E95308D5F9817470BF3D23300D7AF8A651C7F61C06F