Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 22:00:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16BE7E8FC7F7F234BD7F2FA1E1B17B895A88DF9957B40619E005EF4FE5918C20
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussagen der Recherche zum Geheimplan wurde vom Gericht nicht in Zweifel gezogen. Eine Gegendarstellung seitens Correctiv zur Hauptaussage der Recherche gab es nie. Correctiv hat vor Gericht in 2 von 3 Punkten Recht bekommen. https://taz.de/Potsdamer-Remigrations-Treffen/!5992120/ https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/2024/01/12/news-geheimplan-afd-correctiv-live/ https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762927518665912440
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 16BE7E8FC7F7F234BD7F2FA1E1B17B895A88DF9957B40619E005EF4FE5918C20
createdAtMillis - 1709157624306
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 176292751866591244016BE7E8FC7F7F234BD7F2FA1E1B17B895A88DF9957B40619E005EF4FE5918C20