Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 21:20:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 67A4F7AE582A63F1187A4E440C0161D8A92D957C9335015A93678FD3894718F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Hauptaussage der Recherche zum Geheimplan wurde vom Gericht nicht in Zweifel gezogen. Eine schriftliche Gegendarstellung seitens Correctiv zur Hauptaussage der Recherche gab es nie. https://taz.de/Potsdamer-Remigrations-Treffen/!5992120/ https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/2024/01/12/news-geheimplan-afd-correctiv-live/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762924676664143878
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 67A4F7AE582A63F1187A4E440C0161D8A92D957C9335015A93678FD3894718F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1709155218166
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176292467666414387867A4F7AE582A63F1187A4E440C0161D8A92D957C9335015A93678FD3894718F9