Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 23:14:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85C8D15C88A66755B09CDFE207B4B1765529C0CEE3833D4773746BBA0339D2A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Tucker gives an opinion, and he doesn't even say anything about outright voter fraud or the results being false. The writers of the proposed CNs clearly didn't bother to watch the fragment to learn what the argument even was, before "debunking" it. Please do better.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762898270047592472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85C8D15C88A66755B09CDFE207B4B1765529C0CEE3833D4773746BBA0339D2A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1709162074599
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176289827004759247285C8D15C88A66755B09CDFE207B4B1765529C0CEE3833D4773746BBA0339D2A1