Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 20:52:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 67FF16181DB99F45A1E8CDDA16E26A44028997B2BF8E4D49A87E1A56CD27C4FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Tucker gives an opinion, and he doesn't even say anything about outright voter fraud or the results being false. The writers of the proposed CNs clearly didn't bother to watch the fragment to learn what the argument even was, before "debunking" it. Please do better.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762898270047592472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 67FF16181DB99F45A1E8CDDA16E26A44028997B2BF8E4D49A87E1A56CD27C4FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1709153536065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176289827004759247267FF16181DB99F45A1E8CDDA16E26A44028997B2BF8E4D49A87E1A56CD27C4FC