Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 17:07:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The sources in the two currently existing notes (both lists are exactly the same) link to non-peer-reviewed opinion pieces, publications in tiny journals with barely any citations, and, lastly, explanations of crustacean sexual biology.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762885498849067431
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050
  • createdAtMillis - 1709140061263
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17628854988490674318D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050