Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 21:49:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1339BA801CFC7A1F55DD8FEC9F9372E49C8F9E2C6B26898D4C381ADB4AB61488
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tucker lays out reasoned, factual information on ways the voting system itself was changed, or altered from past elections in ways that were found after to be unconstitutional in many states. He is expressing opinion, of course, in discussing these issues. Best reply-yes it was

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762832638836965383
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1339BA801CFC7A1F55DD8FEC9F9372E49C8F9E2C6B26898D4C381ADB4AB61488
  • createdAtMillis - 1709156959796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17628326388369653831339BA801CFC7A1F55DD8FEC9F9372E49C8F9E2C6B26898D4C381ADB4AB61488