Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 12:22:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1BF69D080073B4ADB13B9401036D85B043DED60FAA4200D4AF3E6F1234557E2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This analysis is flawed in that 97 of 124 source studies are cross-sectional (single time point) and thus cannot determine temporality nor distinguish prior smoking-related diseases from vaping-related. Claims made are not verified by the paper. Further flaws addressed here: https://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/research/2024/281-ecig-disease

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762819743226978815
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1BF69D080073B4ADB13B9401036D85B043DED60FAA4200D4AF3E6F1234557E2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1709209370873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17628197432269788151BF69D080073B4ADB13B9401036D85B043DED60FAA4200D4AF3E6F1234557E2B