Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 11:06:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E91EEA7B14E42C0D0D6D3324E61C9FE9CE610D5CDBA79F9FC78106B7E9303EFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Jos hesaria syytetään perseilystä niin ei tämän kumoamiseen voi olla validi lähde että hesari itse kiistää. Ainahan kohde kiistää perseilyn. Vai pitäiskö jokaiseen lehtijuttuun jossa kohde kiistää tapahtuneen laittaa note?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762793071861735629
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E91EEA7B14E42C0D0D6D3324E61C9FE9CE610D5CDBA79F9FC78106B7E9303EFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1709118373705
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762793071861735629E91EEA7B14E42C0D0D6D3324E61C9FE9CE610D5CDBA79F9FC78106B7E9303EFB