Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 09:37:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4188E9BC5AB2DCA05DCE74E4E59C86E23D32199ED462C886D182F8E27E30843
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Darstellung des Herrn Vosgerau ist irreführend, der Artikel von Correctiv muss lediglich in einem Punkt geändert werden! https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/plus250304762/Gerichtsbeschluss-Warum-Correctiv-einen-Satz-aus-der-Geheimtreffen-Recherche-loeschen-muss.html https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/Correctiv-Artikel-Gericht-entscheidet-teilweise-gegen-Klaeger-Vosgerau,correctiv150.html https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762739495537967272
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E4188E9BC5AB2DCA05DCE74E4E59C86E23D32199ED462C886D182F8E27E30843
createdAtMillis - 1709113023706
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1762739495537967272E4188E9BC5AB2DCA05DCE74E4E59C86E23D32199ED462C886D182F8E27E30843