Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 04:05:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFF9694ECF3AD64A5BC7E77470B1D99CB4A956AF2C0E712CF18EEB1749B3C6AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The data is misrepresented as it only looks at the raw numbers without taking into account the relative percentages of those who have had vaccinations. A valid conclusion can only be drawn when the sample size of each group is known. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-533-x/using-utiliser/4072258-eng.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762738683466142026
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFF9694ECF3AD64A5BC7E77470B1D99CB4A956AF2C0E712CF18EEB1749B3C6AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1709179506423
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762738683466142026CFF9694ECF3AD64A5BC7E77470B1D99CB4A956AF2C0E712CF18EEB1749B3C6AC