Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 06:52:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EAE75AF997DF56EB95AF1489133CFA20105069B2999B888DA2DEE864FD0AF91C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Beide CN sind faktisch falsch. Die Äußerungen zum Kern des Treffens (der „Remigration“) waren in der Klage schon nicht angegriffen, weswegen eine angebliche Klage gegen diese nicht „abgewiesen“ werden kann. https://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/correctiv-bericht-was-droht-verfahren/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762731434224095381
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EAE75AF997DF56EB95AF1489133CFA20105069B2999B888DA2DEE864FD0AF91C
  • createdAtMillis - 1709103140343
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762731434224095381EAE75AF997DF56EB95AF1489133CFA20105069B2999B888DA2DEE864FD0AF91C