Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 07:39:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 559D2552591CEFE8B86FCAD3501B85C71E746DB550B91A5022248DC9346F7DC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Beide CN sind faktisch falsch. Die Äußerungen zum Kern des Treffens (der „Remigration“) waren in der Klage schon nicht angegriffen, weswegen eine angebliche Klage gegen diese nicht „abgewiesen“ werden kann. https://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/correctiv-bericht-was-droht-verfahren/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762731434224095381
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 559D2552591CEFE8B86FCAD3501B85C71E746DB550B91A5022248DC9346F7DC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1709105946087
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762731434224095381559D2552591CEFE8B86FCAD3501B85C71E746DB550B91A5022248DC9346F7DC4