Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 10:51:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48D05063ADB962B554277CE9A0B62BF0A7D7997D3E7B75D2E87A3F9A23D47010
Participant Details

Original Note:

Beide CN sind faktisch falsch. Die Äußerungen zum Kern des Treffens (der „Remigration“) waren in der Klage schon nicht angegriffen, weswegen eine angebliche Klage gegen diese nicht „abgewiesen“ werden kann. https://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/correctiv-bericht-was-droht-verfahren/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762731434224095381
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48D05063ADB962B554277CE9A0B62BF0A7D7997D3E7B75D2E87A3F9A23D47010
  • createdAtMillis - 1709117486016
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176273143422409538148D05063ADB962B554277CE9A0B62BF0A7D7997D3E7B75D2E87A3F9A23D47010