Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-28 15:03:36 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
Participant Details
Original Note:
CN's provided so far indicate the tweet is not factual because the Court ruled the mandate directives were "unlawful" whereas the tweet says "illegal". In common parlance these terms are synonyms, and therefore the tweet is factual and not misleading. https://australianemergencylaw.com/2024/02/27/covid-directions-to-qas-and-qps-employees-held-to-be-invalid/ https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/unlawful
All Note Details