Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 03:08:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97A8B0FFA37E856E478FF8D7CBECA497D3A0CD06BC2BD09E6561766665D1934D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not because this is accurate, but because it’s an unfalsifiable claim. It’s impossible to disprove something that itself bears no tangible proof, which is exactly why conspiracy theories are so hard to weed out. For CN purposes it will have to be regarded as an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762617123094831218
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97A8B0FFA37E856E478FF8D7CBECA497D3A0CD06BC2BD09E6561766665D1934D
  • createdAtMillis - 1709089709620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176261712309483121897A8B0FFA37E856E478FF8D7CBECA497D3A0CD06BC2BD09E6561766665D1934D