Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 03:02:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90F251257553FDBDD2C0921705CB2D611E550647E255C2CDEA3119392381A573
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not because this is accurate, but because it’s an unfalsifiable claim. It’s impossible to disprove something that itself bears no tangible proof, which is exactly why conspiracy theories are so hard to weed out. For CN purposes it will have to be regarded as an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762617123094831218
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90F251257553FDBDD2C0921705CB2D611E550647E255C2CDEA3119392381A573
  • createdAtMillis - 1709089328015
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176261712309483121890F251257553FDBDD2C0921705CB2D611E550647E255C2CDEA3119392381A573