Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 00:14:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 539E55FE69CCE143F03B1E54E7DF4613F1C4FC400E72F8C1CF083F35B72D74DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not because this is accurate, but because it’s an unfalsifiable claim. It’s impossible to disprove something that itself bears no tangible proof, which is exactly why conspiracy theories are so hard to weed out. For CN purposes it will have to be regarded as an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762617123094831218
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 539E55FE69CCE143F03B1E54E7DF4613F1C4FC400E72F8C1CF083F35B72D74DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1709079283219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762617123094831218539E55FE69CCE143F03B1E54E7DF4613F1C4FC400E72F8C1CF083F35B72D74DE