Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 01:42:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A02273704E6752B0D182E9FCDE730F2ECA1F651639C9ED24BEB3123A57488AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not because this is accurate, but because it’s an unfalsifiable claim. It’s impossible to disprove something that itself bears no tangible proof, which is exactly why conspiracy theories are so hard to weed out. For CN purposes it will have to be regarded as an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762617123094831218
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A02273704E6752B0D182E9FCDE730F2ECA1F651639C9ED24BEB3123A57488AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1709084563733
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17626171230948312182A02273704E6752B0D182E9FCDE730F2ECA1F651639C9ED24BEB3123A57488AC