Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 00:07:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 161A460A374DB4F563E5A14C61B9ECD4CB29ACCBF232D50B606725BDE4648F8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not because this is accurate, but because it’s an unfalsifiable claim. It’s impossible to disprove something that itself bears no tangible proof, which is exactly why conspiracy theories are so hard to weed out. For CN purposes it will have to be regarded as an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762617123094831218
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 161A460A374DB4F563E5A14C61B9ECD4CB29ACCBF232D50B606725BDE4648F8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1709078843248
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762617123094831218161A460A374DB4F563E5A14C61B9ECD4CB29ACCBF232D50B606725BDE4648F8C