Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 22:51:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8DDA5847A063A09CD73DE58EC9AA0D8B162FF2B64929EA0973E5F0BFD8AB8D53
Participant Details

Original Note:

No hay información o fuente de las declaraciones por lo tanto se considera una tergiversación y/o no menciona información contextural importante, por lo tanto podría ser engañoso. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365127315_Deteccion_del_engano_a_partir_del_estilo_linguistico_Una_revision_sistematizada

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762561068050620799
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8DDA5847A063A09CD73DE58EC9AA0D8B162FF2B64929EA0973E5F0BFD8AB8D53
  • createdAtMillis - 1709074270705
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17625610680506207998DDA5847A063A09CD73DE58EC9AA0D8B162FF2B64929EA0973E5F0BFD8AB8D53