Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 21:40:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4FEC9C3B02EB8B5143C75C0CB5BD2468B31CE2E4EDD1E7A7062CCA35A8C4CAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not a secret deposition - available online since 1998. Gates was not “innocent” because it was an antitrust case, not a criminal trial. Microsoft initially lost, but partially won on appeal. Summary of the case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762551116615888970
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4FEC9C3B02EB8B5143C75C0CB5BD2468B31CE2E4EDD1E7A7062CCA35A8C4CAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1709070028577
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762551116615888970E4FEC9C3B02EB8B5143C75C0CB5BD2468B31CE2E4EDD1E7A7062CCA35A8C4CAF