Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 23:24:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B6DE1F4E962E859F4E5412B9019E82FB57CA90D0DBA181D00C26579F9E206F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not a secret deposition - available online since 1998. Gates was not “innocent” because it was an antitrust case, not a criminal trial. Microsoft initially lost, but partially won on appeal. Summary of the case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762551116615888970
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4B6DE1F4E962E859F4E5412B9019E82FB57CA90D0DBA181D00C26579F9E206F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1709421883900
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17625511166158889704B6DE1F4E962E859F4E5412B9019E82FB57CA90D0DBA181D00C26579F9E206F6