Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 01:29:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AA1853BEAD0BE96E9FFB952A4FA55825F1119BF1D11F444B1F3B58397106170
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussage, das Gericht habe "bestätigt, dass Correctiv mit Unwahrheiten und gezielter Hetze gegen unsere AfD den politischen Diskurs massiv beeinflussen wollte", ist unwahr. Es ging nicht um Kernvorwürfe. Bei den angegriffenen Nebenaspekten unterlag correctiv nur in 1 Punkt: https://x.com/lto_de/status/1762483992354238570?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762538818878509069
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AA1853BEAD0BE96E9FFB952A4FA55825F1119BF1D11F444B1F3B58397106170
  • createdAtMillis - 1709083744686
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17625388188785090696AA1853BEAD0BE96E9FFB952A4FA55825F1119BF1D11F444B1F3B58397106170