Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 10:59:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 469C188BD5CDC22F1258966CCB02290A0D989344874F422628AE8D403267AEAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussage, das Gericht habe "bestätigt, dass Correctiv mit Unwahrheiten und gezielter Hetze gegen unsere AfD den politischen Diskurs massiv beeinflussen wollte", ist unwahr. Es ging nicht um Kernvorwürfe. Bei den angegriffenen Nebenaspekten unterlag correctiv nur in 1 Punkt: https://x.com/lto_de/status/1762483992354238570?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762538818878509069
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 469C188BD5CDC22F1258966CCB02290A0D989344874F422628AE8D403267AEAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1709117945035
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1762538818878509069469C188BD5CDC22F1258966CCB02290A0D989344874F422628AE8D403267AEAE