Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 20:47:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 440DD5D2FFFD12681A0C7B8A57066513D2EA870A27B9CB2E049F0ECE12402F65
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussage, das Gericht habe "bestätigt, dass Correctiv mit Unwahrheiten und gezielter Hetze gegen unsere AfD den politischen Diskurs massiv beeinflussen wollte", ist unwahr. Es ging nicht um Kernvorwürfe. Bei den angegriffenen Nebenaspekten unterlag correctiv nur in 1 Punkt: https://x.com/lto_de/status/1762483992354238570?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762538818878509069
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 440DD5D2FFFD12681A0C7B8A57066513D2EA870A27B9CB2E049F0ECE12402F65
  • createdAtMillis - 1709066863194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762538818878509069440DD5D2FFFD12681A0C7B8A57066513D2EA870A27B9CB2E049F0ECE12402F65