Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 20:59:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3BD1ADC52728599CEDA0ABB22AB6E8C92D5FE582A7F813F774B6F314E6F35454
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussage, das Gericht habe "bestätigt, dass Correctiv mit Unwahrheiten und gezielter Hetze gegen unsere AfD den politischen Diskurs massiv beeinflussen wollte", ist unwahr. Es ging nicht um Kernvorwürfe. Bei den angegriffenen Nebenaspekten unterlag correctiv nur in 1 Punkt: https://x.com/lto_de/status/1762483992354238570?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762538818878509069
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3BD1ADC52728599CEDA0ABB22AB6E8C92D5FE582A7F813F774B6F314E6F35454
  • createdAtMillis - 1709067568721
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17625388188785090693BD1ADC52728599CEDA0ABB22AB6E8C92D5FE582A7F813F774B6F314E6F35454