Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 22:33:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FE695356ECAD49D346EC8B6CDD570BC4AEE16D59B748F112B5FEC94FDACAE56
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussage, das Gericht habe "bestätigt, dass Correctiv mit Unwahrheiten und gezielter Hetze gegen unsere AfD den politischen Diskurs massiv beeinflussen wollte", ist unwahr. Es ging nicht um Kernvorwürfe. Bei den angegriffenen Nebenaspekten unterlag correctiv nur in 1 Punkt: https://x.com/lto_de/status/1762483992354238570?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762538818878509069
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1FE695356ECAD49D346EC8B6CDD570BC4AEE16D59B748F112B5FEC94FDACAE56
  • createdAtMillis - 1709073191569
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17625388188785090691FE695356ECAD49D346EC8B6CDD570BC4AEE16D59B748F112B5FEC94FDACAE56