Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 16:38:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CA2EF04541D03A94BEE114C9BBC5AAA3349551D3610030D4480080D299A1F78
Participant Details

Original Note:

Keine Anmerkung nötig: Der Autor beschreibt den gerichtlichen Sieg Herrn Vosgeraus. Eine Falschbehauptung wurde also tatsächlich gerichtlich verboten. Der Autor leugnet zudem nicht die Tatsache, dass es sich um einen Teilerfolg handelt. https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/correctiv-und-geheimtreffen-einstweilige-verfuegung-teilweise-erfolgreich-ld.1819664

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762515211896950820
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4CA2EF04541D03A94BEE114C9BBC5AAA3349551D3610030D4480080D299A1F78
createdAtMillis - 1709051939891
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17625152118969508204CA2EF04541D03A94BEE114C9BBC5AAA3349551D3610030D4480080D299A1F78