Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 05:33:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4A86FD9F6A5C420F35D6A6055E662DA0295A73AB2BEE0F29E2B87CB958EB5B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Gericht hat Correctiv nur eine Aussage zu angeblichen Plänen zur Delegetimierung der nächsten Bundestagswahl untersagt. Hinsichtlich der zentralen Punkte des Artikels zum Thema Remigration wurde die Klage abgewiesen. Quelle: https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762514388693475719
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D4A86FD9F6A5C420F35D6A6055E662DA0295A73AB2BEE0F29E2B87CB958EB5B2
createdAtMillis - 1710999212471
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1762514388693475719D4A86FD9F6A5C420F35D6A6055E662DA0295A73AB2BEE0F29E2B87CB958EB5B2