Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 17:47:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B33B1A6B14A7F1993A2A1985F4651A0095DEDFBBA162AA058EE5082B010780C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Gericht hat Correctiv nur eine Aussage zu angeblichen Plänen zur Delegetimierung der nächsten Bundestagswahl untersagt. Hinsichtlich der zentralen Punkte des Artikels zum Thema Remigration wurde die Klage abgewiesen. Quelle: https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762514388693475719
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B33B1A6B14A7F1993A2A1985F4651A0095DEDFBBA162AA058EE5082B010780C4
createdAtMillis - 1709056042189
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1762514388693475719B33B1A6B14A7F1993A2A1985F4651A0095DEDFBBA162AA058EE5082B010780C4