Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 23:54:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. The recent ruling addressed procedural flaws within a specific vaccine directive. It did not declare vaccine mandates universally illegal or validate claims of human rights violations. Context is vital in interpreting legal decisions accurately. https://twitter.com/ExposingNV/status/1762352070840226219 https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2024/QSC24-002.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762509198468976940
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
createdAtMillis - 1709078055936
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1762509198468976940F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE