Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 13:34:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. The recent ruling addressed procedural flaws within a specific vaccine directive. It did not declare vaccine mandates universally illegal or validate claims of human rights violations. Context is vital in interpreting legal decisions accurately. https://twitter.com/ExposingNV/status/1762352070840226219 https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2024/QSC24-002.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762509198468976940
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E
createdAtMillis - 1709127273894
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1762509198468976940F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E