Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 21:55:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E0D15D1DF359FE235745F01A597F9E4C6FF5E96E822F02B1D3A04C34CA36A96
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. The recent ruling addressed procedural flaws within a specific vaccine directive. It did not declare vaccine mandates universally illegal or validate claims of human rights violations. Context is vital in interpreting legal decisions accurately. https://twitter.com/ExposingNV/status/1762352070840226219 https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2024/QSC24-002.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762509198468976940
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2E0D15D1DF359FE235745F01A597F9E4C6FF5E96E822F02B1D3A04C34CA36A96
createdAtMillis - 1709070938395
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17625091984689769402E0D15D1DF359FE235745F01A597F9E4C6FF5E96E822F02B1D3A04C34CA36A96