Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 22:38:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0ABB2BA85A5DEBB76C25E687B02AD8463CB924FFCAC224B9D613A841093A2B55
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. The recent ruling addressed procedural flaws within a specific vaccine directive. It did not declare vaccine mandates universally illegal or validate claims of human rights violations. Context is vital in interpreting legal decisions accurately. https://twitter.com/ExposingNV/status/1762352070840226219 https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2024/QSC24-002.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762509198468976940
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0ABB2BA85A5DEBB76C25E687B02AD8463CB924FFCAC224B9D613A841093A2B55
createdAtMillis - 1709073523833
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17625091984689769400ABB2BA85A5DEBB76C25E687B02AD8463CB924FFCAC224B9D613A841093A2B55