Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 16:20:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wichtiger Kontext: Alle zentralen Punkte der Correctiv Recherche wurden durch das Urteil nicht berührt. Correctiv hat in 2 von 3 Punkten Recht bekommen. https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762496801691611490
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71
  • createdAtMillis - 1709050829307
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762496801691611490A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71