Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 19:23:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98C75305AEFCB222D9E71085A8E0244329D92FD5CD6EC732D1B0EF3A81597C3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wichtiger Kontext: Alle zentralen Punkte der Correctiv Recherche wurden durch das Urteil nicht berührt. Correctiv hat in 2 von 3 Punkten Recht bekommen. https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762496801691611490
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98C75305AEFCB222D9E71085A8E0244329D92FD5CD6EC732D1B0EF3A81597C3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1709061830981
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176249680169161149098C75305AEFCB222D9E71085A8E0244329D92FD5CD6EC732D1B0EF3A81597C3A