Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 09:35:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7708D58FCC8B4C80CEC3188B2E1E6083C70F92E40F37C038B42A27922593B82
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Gericht hat Correctiv nur eine Aussage zu angeblichen Plänen zur Delegetimierung der nächsten Bundestagswahl untersagt. Hinsichtlich der zentralen Punkte des Artikels zum Thema Remigration wurde die Klage abgewiesen. Quelle: https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762492193548198063
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A7708D58FCC8B4C80CEC3188B2E1E6083C70F92E40F37C038B42A27922593B82
createdAtMillis - 1709112905883
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1762492193548198063A7708D58FCC8B4C80CEC3188B2E1E6083C70F92E40F37C038B42A27922593B82