Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 21:51:15 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 477074D5011386A0A5F941401C3DDCCCA4C5EC0A336CAF7B0E1D993B028CC038
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Gericht hat Correctiv nur eine Aussage zu angeblichen Plänen zur Delegetimierung der nächsten Bundestagswahl untersagt. Hinsichtlich der zentralen Punkte des Artikels zum Thema Remigration wurde die Klage abgewiesen. Quelle: https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762491391802769738
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 477074D5011386A0A5F941401C3DDCCCA4C5EC0A336CAF7B0E1D993B028CC038
createdAtMillis - 1709243475857
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1762491391802769738477074D5011386A0A5F941401C3DDCCCA4C5EC0A336CAF7B0E1D993B028CC038