Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 02:57:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E689A684DE033B5F9619A62836DA66177F79B42DF6EA871B2D8E06A0AF3E8CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si fue censurado argumentando que se violo los datos personales de la reportera al dar a conocer su teléfono, siendo que en realidad dicho teléfono es publico desde hace 4 años,entonces se esta utilizando este pretexto, de forma emgañoza,para darse el derecho de censurar. TNYT https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802268?hl=es&ref_topic=9282436

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1762272068941292022
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4E689A684DE033B5F9619A62836DA66177F79B42DF6EA871B2D8E06A0AF3E8CB
createdAtMillis - 1709002678091
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17622720689412920224E689A684DE033B5F9619A62836DA66177F79B42DF6EA871B2D8E06A0AF3E8CB