Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 23:28:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6305E9FE97CFEA14E89156AC0473871CE9409533026F217B65D29BD3C329F14A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article referenced was quickly retracted after being found to be highly problematic with numerous incorrect claims and misrepresentations. The authors of this article have made similar, disproven claims in the past. The senior author lost his board certification. https://retractionwatch.com/2024/02/19/paper-claiming-extensive-harms-of-covid-19-vaccines-to-be-retracted/ https://www.factcheck.org/2024/02/scicheck-review-article-by-misinformation-spreaders-misleads-about-mrna-covid-19-vaccines/ https://medriva.com/breaking-news/the-importance-of-credibility-and-professional-expertise-in-evaluating-scientific-findings-a-case-study-on-a-retracted-paper-about-covid-vaccines/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762250363598700828
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6305E9FE97CFEA14E89156AC0473871CE9409533026F217B65D29BD3C329F14A
  • createdAtMillis - 1708990088906
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17622503635987008286305E9FE97CFEA14E89156AC0473871CE9409533026F217B65D29BD3C329F14A